Justin+N

2. In “The Debate That Never Rests” by Pamela Paul she uses invented ethos. In the article she says, “My program, developed by a women my husband and I call the Baby Nazi, instructs parents to schedule what baby and mommy should do at every given moment. Severe as it sounds, it seems to work.” What this means is that she found a way to have the baby sleep. My explanation why i picked this was to show that she made something up that is not true for everyone. She also uses a little situated ethos too but mostly invented. My explanation for that is she wanted to convince people that these theories are real instead of making them true. Overall she uses really good invented ethos therefore it convinces readers to try the things she explained.

- Justin Newkirk

3. The writer of this opinion editorial (Rotten in Ozone Park) shows a little pathos by showing some sympathy about the old racetrack. The point of this article is to convince readers to vote on if they want a casino on the old grandstand or not. It would be really sad if they did because that park has been there such a long time that a lot of people have memories there. In fact, it would be an even greater emotional ride if they put a casino there because of people losing their money. From the data in this editorial they have concluded that it is an argument with the state government to build a casino their. The explanation to this is that they have put a public option on it and they have decided not to go through with this. It also is a “hazard to the trees around it because they wouldnt get enough oxygen” according to Kristen Rogers. Therefore I have come to my conclusion in which they wont build a casino there because of the citizens opinions.

- Justin Newkirk